Letters From Iwo Jima Finally Gets A Bad Review
loads of Iwo Jima post today LOL
as from the title, I found this interesting (cos it's against all the review I've read)
Let's see what they said
"Letters From Iwo Jima"
Clint Eastwood shows us the Battle of Iwo Jima from the viewpoint of the Japanese soldiers who fought and died there.
By Stephanie Zacharek
Clint Eastwood's "Letters From Iwo Jima" springs from an admirable impulse: This companion piece to Eastwood's flawed yet complex "Flags of Our Fathers" sets out to tell the story of the Battle of Iwo Jima from the viewpoint of the Japanese soldiers who fought and died there. Eastwood, working from a script by Iris Yamashita (the story is by Yamashita and Paul Haggis), hopes to humanize these soldiers, showing them as inexperienced young men who loved their families, who were under orders from their superiors to fight viciously, and who were victims of a culture in which dying honorably was considered far more important than preserving life.
The impulse is commendable; the movie isn't. More than 6,000 American soldiers were killed during the 36-day battle; the number of Japanese troops killed was 21,000, which included most of the soldiers defending the island. The Japanese were notoriously vicious fighters. (Firsthand accounts from servicemen who fought in the Pacific arena, like William Manchester's memoir "Goodbye, Darkness," are numerous and remarkably consistent. And the idea of the Japanese as ruthless warriors isn't just a Western prejudice, as the Chinese who survived the Rape of Nanking would tell you.) There's no doubt that Americans at the time of World War II, including civilians, found it all too easy to caricature the Japanese as the "other." Even Bugs Bunny cartoons portrayed the Japanese as something other than human. As Paul Fussell wrote in his essay "Thank God for the Atom Bomb," "Among Americans it was widely held that the Japanese were really subhuman, little yellow beasts, and popular imagery depicted them as lice, rats, bats, vipers, dogs, and monkeys." He goes on to note that "some of the marines landing on Iwo Jima had 'Rodent Exterminator' written on their helmet covers." You could see characterizations like that in movies made during the war, like the 1943 "Bataan."
Taken from Salon
Actually it's not actually bad review. Zacharek just reveals the fact that Eastwood has chosen to noticeably dial down the documented viciousness of the Japanese soldiers. But,in addiction to what Eastwood said in so many interview we've seen, he said "It's not the real victory" or something like that, right?
So, it's depend on your view just go and watch it
Bad news again. Flags and Iwojima release date in Thai is now on hiatus -_-'' WTF Warner Thai!
Comments
even though its a bad review, the metacritic percentage is 50% and yet its fresh at rotten tomatoes, she can't make out her mind on it & full of bias against the film. that writer has a history of hating anything that Eastwood comes up with.
from all the review i read (A LOT of it) i'v come to a conclusion that Letters is a good bordering to great movie, excellent yet flawed & our Nino is teriffic in it but not enough to boost him for an Oscar.
Also... many people who get offended ... because the americans are bad guys in this film? because it "doesn't go according to history"? I think these people are sometimes delusional. At the end of the day, Iwojima is simply a movie. If they want History, they should read books or watch documentaries. The whole of Iwojima squeezed into a 2hr+ film is just not enough. Reading the IMDB sometimes juz killed my braincells.
End of rant. =P
yup, she's not against Nino....from what I recall from the bad reviews generally don't comment on the performance. I think there's one that's not impressed with Ken and another saying Ken is the only impressive one.. critique, its very subjective ne~
rin! *glomp*
imdb does that. I tend to just skip along the trolls, yet some of the posters do have a point (esp. coming level headed ones). Plus we get to learn history from totally unqualified proffessors **hehehe**